Results in mediastinal lymph node staging of surgical lung cancer: Data from the prospective cohort of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of combined computerised tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in mediastinal staging of surgical lung cancer based on data obtained from the prospective cohort of the Spanish Group for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (GEVATS). METHODS: A total of 2782 patients underwent surgery for primary lung carcinoma. We analysed diagnostic success in mediastinal lymph node staging (cN2) using CT and PET. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed of the factors involved in this success. The risk of unexpected pN2 disease was analysed for cases in which an invasive testing is recommended: cN1, the tumour centrally located or the tumour diameter >3 cm. RESULTS: The overall success of CT together with PET was 82.9% with a positive predictive value of 0.21 and negative predictive value of 0.93. If the tumour was larger than 3 cm and for each unit increase in mediastinal SUVmax, the probability of success was lower with OR 0.59 (0.44-0.79) and 0.71 (0.66-0.75), respectively. In the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach, the probability of success was higher with OR 2.04 (1.52-2.73). The risk of unexpected pN2 increased with the risk factors cN1, the tumour centrally located or the tumour diameter >3 cm: from 4.5% (0 factors) to 18.8% (3 factors) but did not differ significantly as a function of whether invasive testing was performed. CONCLUSIONS: CT and PET together have a high negative predictive value. The overall success of the staging is lower in the case of tumours >3 cm and high mediastinal SUVmax, and it is higher when VATS is performed. The risk of unexpected pN2 is higher if the disease is cN1, the tumour centrally located or the tumour diameter >3 cm but does not vary significantly as a function of whether patients have undergone invasive testing.

Factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de complicaciones tras tratamiento quirúrgico del carcinoma broncopulmonar / Risk factors for the development of complications after surgical treatment for bronchopulmonary carcinoma

INTRODUCCIÓN: El tratamiento más adecuado en la mayoría de los pacientes con cáncer de pulmón en estadio inicial es la resección quirúrgica. A pesar de evaluar anteriormente que el estado de cada paciente sea el adecuado para detectar posibles complicaciones inherentes a la intervención quirúrgica, no se ha alcanzado ningún consenso sobre los factores que son de «alto riesgo» en esos pacientes. Nuestro estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar la morbilidad y la incidencia de mortalidad asociada con esta intervención quirúrgica en nuestro entorno con un estudio multicéntrico y descubrir los parámetros de riesgo. MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio de análisis prospectivo con 3.307 pacientes operados de carcinoma broncopulmonar en 24 hospitales. Las variables de estudio fueron edad, sistema TNM, sexo, estadio, tabaquismo, abordaje quirúrgico, resección quirúrgica, escala ECOG, tratamiento neoadyuvante, comorbilidad, valores espirométricos y morbimortalidad intra- y postoperatoria. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística multivariante de los factores pronósticos de morbilidad y mortalidad. RESULTADOS: Registramos el 34,2% de morbilidad postoperatoria y el 2,1% de mortalidad postoperatoria. Sexo, infarto de miocardio, angina, ECOG ≥ 1, EPOC, DLCO < 60%, estado clínico patológico, resección quirúrgica y abordaje quirúrgico aparecieron como factores pronósticos de morbilidad y mortalidad en cirugía de cáncer de pulmón en nuestra serie. CONCLUSIONES: Las principales variables que deben tenerse en cuenta al evaluar a pacientes con cáncer de pulmón para realizarles una intervención quirúrgica son sexo, infarto de miocardio, angina, ECOG, EPOC, DLCO, estado clínico patológico, resección quirúrgica y abordaje quirúrgico

INTRODUCTION: The most suitable treatment in most early-stage lung cancer patients is surgical resection. Despite previously assessing each patient's status being relevant to detect possible complications inherent to surgery, no consensus has been reached on which factors are "high risk" in such patients. Our study aimed to analyse the morbidity and the mortality incidence associated with this surgery in our setting with a multicentre study and to detect risk parameters. METHODS: A prospective analysis study with 3,307 patients operated for bronchopulmonary carcinoma in 24 hospitals. Study variables were age, TNM, gender, stage, smoking habit, surgery approach, surgical resection, ECOG, neoadjuvant therapy, comorbidity, spirometric values, and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the morbidity and mortality predictor factors was done. RESULTS: We recorded 34.2% postoperative morbidity and 2.1% postoperative mortality. Gender, myocardial infarction, angina, ECOG ≥1, COPD, DLCO <60%, clinical pathological status, surgical resection and surgery approach were shown as morbidity and mortality predictor factors in lung cancer surgery in our series. CONCLUSIONS: The main variables to consider when assessing the lung cancer patients to undergo surgery are gender, myocardial infarction, angina, ECOG, COPD, DLCO, clinical pathological status, surgical resection and surgery approach

Risk factors for the development of complications after surgical treatment for bronchopulmonary carcinoma. / Factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de complicaciones tras tratamiento quirúrgico del carcinoma broncopulmonar.

INTRODUCTION: The most suitable treatment in most early-stage lung cancer patients is surgical resection. Despite previously assessing each patient's status being relevant to detect possible complications inherent to surgery, no consensus has been reached on which factors are "high risk" in such patients. Our study aimed to analyse the morbidity and the mortality incidence associated with this surgery in our setting with a multicentre study and to detect risk parameters. METHODS: A prospective analysis study with 3,307 patients operated for bronchopulmonary carcinoma in 24 hospitals. Study variables were age, TNM, gender, stage, smoking habit, surgery approach, surgical resection, ECOG, neoadjuvant therapy, comorbidity, spirometric values, and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the morbidity and mortality predictor factors was done. RESULTS: We recorded 34.2% postoperative morbidity and 2.1% postoperative mortality. Gender, myocardial infarction, angina, ECOG ≥1, COPD, DLCO <60%, clinical pathological status, surgical resection and surgery approach were shown as morbidity and mortality predictor factors in lung cancer surgery in our series. CONCLUSIONS: The main variables to consider when assessing the lung cancer patients to undergo surgery are gender, myocardial infarction, angina, ECOG, COPD, DLCO, clinical pathological status, surgical resection and surgery approach.

Management of Bronchial Complications After Lung Transplantation and Sequelae.

Airway complication (AC) after lung transplant, although rare nowadays, leads to increased costs, greater morbidity, and decreased quality of life of patients. Over the years, many risk factors have been described, ranging from surgical technique to immunosuppressive regimen. There are essentially 6 major airway complications (necrosis/dehiscence, infection, bronchial stenosis, granulomas, tracheo-bronchomalacia, and fistula) all of which require a multidisciplinary approach based on the performance status of patients. In this article, the authors review the risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis methods, and management options in the most common AC after lung transplantation.

Clinical lung transplantation from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors revisited.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to review and update the long-term results from our previously published series of lung transplantation in uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs). METHODS: A prospective collection of data was undertaken from all lung transplants performed among uncontrolled NHBDs between 2002 and December 2009. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software and survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-nine lung transplants were performed. Mean total ischemic times for the first and second lung were 575 minutes (SD 115.6) and 701 minutes (SD 111.3), respectively. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) G1, G2 and G3 occurred in 5 cases (17%), 5 cases (17%) and 11 cases (38%), respectively. Overall hospital mortality rate was 17% (5 patients). Statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant association of mortality with ischemic times and with PGD. In terms of overall survival, 3-month, 1-year, 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 78%, 68%, 57% and 51%, respectively, and the conditional survival rates in those who survived the first 3 months were 86%, 72% and 65%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) was 11%, 35% and 45% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors shows acceptable results for both mid- and long-term survival and BOS; however, the higher rates of PGD and its impact on early mortality must make us more demanding with respect to the acceptance criteria and methods of evaluation used with these donors.